<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What&#8217;s old is new again</title>
	<atom:link href="http://greeleysghost.brian-fuller.com/2009/11/17/whats-old-is-new-again-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://greeleysghost.brian-fuller.com/2009/11/17/whats-old-is-new-again-2/</link>
	<description>Brian Fuller's blog on the state of media and communications</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 15:58:09 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.3</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://greeleysghost.brian-fuller.com/2009/11/17/whats-old-is-new-again-2/comment-page-1/#comment-1219</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 18:27:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greeleysghost.brian-fuller.com/?p=1039#comment-1219</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s obviously an issue, Jackie. I was credited, but the question remains how do you handle monetization? In the case of Twitpics there&#039;s an un-spoken agreement that because I throw pictures up there at will and make no bones about getting paid that people are free to use them. 
Same thing with blogs, etc. 
That&#039;s not to say that this dynamic won&#039;t change over time as people get more serious about valuing their social content.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s obviously an issue, Jackie. I was credited, but the question remains how do you handle monetization? In the case of Twitpics there&#8217;s an un-spoken agreement that because I throw pictures up there at will and make no bones about getting paid that people are free to use them.<br />
Same thing with blogs, etc.<br />
That&#8217;s not to say that this dynamic won&#8217;t change over time as people get more serious about valuing their social content.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jackie Damian</title>
		<link>http://greeleysghost.brian-fuller.com/2009/11/17/whats-old-is-new-again-2/comment-page-1/#comment-1218</link>
		<dc:creator>Jackie Damian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 14:47:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greeleysghost.brian-fuller.com/?p=1039#comment-1218</guid>
		<description>Interesting, Brian. Of course, the one problem is that you weren&#039;t credited, much less paid, for your photo of the downed cyclist. Information may &quot;want to be free,&quot; but how are its purveyors supposed to eat??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting, Brian. Of course, the one problem is that you weren&#8217;t credited, much less paid, for your photo of the downed cyclist. Information may &#8220;want to be free,&#8221; but how are its purveyors supposed to eat??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
