Can newspapers not suck….?
Posted on | October 16, 2007 | No Comments

…This is the question posed today by Roy Peter Clark at Poynter. He writes:
In my opinion, the newspapers I most often read not only do not suck, but are better than they have ever been: I’m thinking Atlanta, St. Pete, New Orleans, Portland (Oregon), Newark, Seattle, Fort Lauderdale, Raleigh, just to name a few.
It’s a thoughtful essay with some great comments. Check it out.
The one thing most people involved in these conversations miss, though, is that there are TONS of newspapers that don’t suck and they’re in almost every city in the country. They’re called alternative weeklies. They’re free, full of ads and stunningly engaged with their communities. There are also highly engaged business weeklies that are must-reads in local business communities. These and other types of alternatives nupes have emerged over the past 3-4 decades because daily newspapers took their eye off the ball.
So, to fix the problem, daily newspaper editors need to look at alternative weeklies, read a little of John Duncan’s insights at The Inksniffer and get on the ball.
If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!
Related posts:
- Newspapers have legs: Macy’s exec
- Online Real Estate Ad Revenue to Eclipse Newspapers by 2012
- What’s killing newspapers? Newsrooms
- Newspapers will never get IT right
- Falling, falling, falling
Comments
No Responses to “Can newspapers not suck….?”
Leave a Reply
October 16th, 2007 @ 9:39 pm
I agree with you on the alternative weeklies up to a point, and that point’s name is Mike Lacey. Every newspaper snapped up by the Evil Baron of Phoenix becomes worthless trash. Witness Village Voice. Witness anything with “New Times” in its name. And witness Denver’s Westword. The little scrappy independent weekly in Colorado Springs, CS Independent, can whup Westword with one hand behind its back, because it’s feisty, news-oriented, and not owned by Michael Lacey.
October 20th, 2007 @ 9:06 am
I may have to amend my own complaint about Mike Lacey – he went to jail last week to protect New Times’ rights against a ridiculously fraudulent grand jury. His roster of papers still suck in a general sense, but we should acknowledge the importance of this case, as reported Saturday in the NYT:
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/20/
business/media/20arizona.html
Luckily, the special investigator in this case looks likely to lose his license to practice law.
July 31st, 2008 @ 12:55 am
专业的翻译公å¸ï¼Œè¯‘佰深圳翻译公å¸ï¼Œå¹¿å·žç¿»è¯‘å…¬å¸ï¼Œä¸Šæµ·ç¿»è¯‘å…¬å¸,东莞翻译公å¸å›½å†…åŒå£°ç¿»è¯‘(åŒå£°ä¼ 译)领域领头军ï¼åŒå£°ä¼ 译(åŒä¼ )是国际会议通常使用的翻译方å¼ï¼Œ 翻译人员进入隔音间里,通过耳机接å¬å‘言人的声音å†å°†å…¶ç¿»è¯‘ç»™å¬ä¼—。这ç§å½¢å¼çš„翻译方å¼éœ€è¦è¾ƒä¸ºå¤æ‚的设备以åŠéžå¸¸ä¸“业的翻译人员,但能节çœå¤§é‡çš„æ—¶é—´ã€‚优质翻译公å¸è¯‘佰翻译公å¸èƒ½æä¾›åŒä¼ 深圳英è¯ç¿»è¯‘ ,深圳日è¯ç¿»è¯‘,深圳法è¯ç¿»è¯‘,深圳德è¯ç¿»è¯‘,深圳俄è¯ç¿»è¯‘,深圳韩è¯ç¿»è¯‘ç‰æ•°ç§åŒä¼ è¯è¨€ï¼ŒåŸ¹å…»ä¸€æ‰¹å•†åŠ¡å£è¯‘人员,多年以æ¥ï¼Œè¯‘ä½°åŒå£°ç¿»è¯‘在åŒå£°ä¼ 译(åŒä¼ )领域积累了丰富的业务ç»éªŒï¼Œèƒ½æä¾›ä»Žä¸“业åŒå£°ç¿»è¯‘ã€è¯‘员培è®åˆ°åŒä¼ 设备安装租售业务ç‰ä¸€æ•´å¥—国际会议åŒä¼ æœåŠ¡æ·±åœ³ç¿»è¯‘ã€‚